Russia on alert over plan to kill Putin in Iran
Russian news reports say President Vladimir Putin has been told of a plot to assassinate him when he visits Iran this week.The Interfax news sgency said Sunday that suicide bombers have been training to attack Mr. Putin.The Kremlin has not commented. But a member of Russia's parliamentary security committee told Russian television that the information came from intelligence sources which could be considered highly reliable.Iran's Foreign Ministry calls the reports totally baseless and says they are aimed at undermining Russian-Iranian relations.Mr. Putin is scheduled to arrive in Tehran Monday and plans to meet with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. They plan to attend Tuesday's summit of nations bordering the Caspian Sea. SOURCE
Sunday, October 14, 2007
Illegal Aliens and Insurgents show hatred toward America
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=540_1181185880&p=1
This video is a few months old but it shows how we are vulnerable within our borders. How will these same "residents/occupants" living here react if we were attacked. They will take what they have and cut and run! Most of them will probably submit to Islam, who knows?
The United States, having been invaded by Mexico and Central America, is now experiencing the genesis of an insurgency. Led by communist and socialist groups, illegal aliens and their offspring are turning out immigration rallies to spew hate and anti-Americanism in our very own streets.
This video is a few months old but it shows how we are vulnerable within our borders. How will these same "residents/occupants" living here react if we were attacked. They will take what they have and cut and run! Most of them will probably submit to Islam, who knows?
The United States, having been invaded by Mexico and Central America, is now experiencing the genesis of an insurgency. Led by communist and socialist groups, illegal aliens and their offspring are turning out immigration rallies to spew hate and anti-Americanism in our very own streets.
Friday, October 12, 2007
Covering Up the Nazi Past of "Gun Control" (JPFO)
As we have documented in our book _"Gun Control": Gateway to Tyranny_ ( www.jpfo.org/gateway.htm ), the 1968 Gun Control Act (GCA) was copied from the 1938 Nazi Weapons Law. Reading the two laws side-by-side, the evidence is insurmountable. And who chose to incorporate Nazi law into American law? Connecticut Senator Thomas Dodd, who
participated in the Nuremberg trials and was intimately familiar with the Nazi regime.
The GCA is drenched in the blood of those who have been murdered by the BATFE with the blessing of the US Congress.
participated in the Nuremberg trials and was intimately familiar with the Nazi regime.
The GCA is drenched in the blood of those who have been murdered by the BATFE with the blessing of the US Congress.
We call on Congress to open the files of Thomas Dodd to learn the truth about why he was so fond of Nazi law ... and so concerned about firearms in the hands of American citizens.
Today we release another handbill in our "Repudiate and Humiliate" campaign; see it at www.jpfo.org/handbill-thomasdodd.jpg . It is imperative to wake people up to the scandalous background of the GCA. You can also learn more about the evils caused by the GCA -- including the criminal acts of the GCA's primary enforcement agency, the BATFE -- by buying and watching our documentary _The Gang_. Visit http://www.thegangmovie.com/ for more information.
Today we release another handbill in our "Repudiate and Humiliate" campaign; see it at www.jpfo.org/handbill-thomasdodd.jpg . It is imperative to wake people up to the scandalous background of the GCA. You can also learn more about the evils caused by the GCA -- including the criminal acts of the GCA's primary enforcement agency, the BATFE -- by buying and watching our documentary _The Gang_. Visit http://www.thegangmovie.com/ for more information.
Don't forget that you can see all of our handbills at www.jpfo.org/freebies.htm . Download them and distribute them everywhere (for non-commercial purposes). Humiliate and repudiate those who want to destroy YOUR freedom!
Machiavellian Plot Emerges Among Limbaugh Attackers
By Chris Adamo, New Media Journal.US
Conservative Americans who witnessed the deliberate misinterpretation and unwarranted liberal hysterics over Rush Limbaugh’s “phony soldiers” commentary, will be tempted to brand the incident an isolated, albeit ridiculously overblown, effort to discredit the powerhouse of conservatism in America. Yet while this assessment is not entirely inaccurate, it reveals only the tip of a malevolent “iceberg.”
To many people’s amazement, the sorry episode drags on. Yet its protracted nature reveals the intentions of those who seek to execute a much darker and grander scheme.
It is true that, as a result of their exaggerated complaints and indignant screed, this continued droning of key liberal players and the Democrat Party faithful makes them appear petty, hypocritical, and buffoonish for their participation in this squabble. Moreover, Limbaugh is having his usual good time successfully portraying them this way. Yet, that is a price they are willing to pay, and moreover believe they are compelled to pay, being that their future political successes are so contingent on neutralizing him and his kind. CONTINUED
Conservative Americans who witnessed the deliberate misinterpretation and unwarranted liberal hysterics over Rush Limbaugh’s “phony soldiers” commentary, will be tempted to brand the incident an isolated, albeit ridiculously overblown, effort to discredit the powerhouse of conservatism in America. Yet while this assessment is not entirely inaccurate, it reveals only the tip of a malevolent “iceberg.”
To many people’s amazement, the sorry episode drags on. Yet its protracted nature reveals the intentions of those who seek to execute a much darker and grander scheme.
It is true that, as a result of their exaggerated complaints and indignant screed, this continued droning of key liberal players and the Democrat Party faithful makes them appear petty, hypocritical, and buffoonish for their participation in this squabble. Moreover, Limbaugh is having his usual good time successfully portraying them this way. Yet, that is a price they are willing to pay, and moreover believe they are compelled to pay, being that their future political successes are so contingent on neutralizing him and his kind. CONTINUED
Another U.N. Power Grab
What would Reagan do? On the Law of the Sea Treaty, we know the answer.
BY WILLIAM P. CLARK AND EDWIN MEESE
It is an impressive testament to the abiding affection and political influence of former President Ronald Reagan that the fate of a controversial treaty now before the U.S. Senate may ultimately turn on a single question: What would Reagan do?
As we had the privilege of working closely with President Reagan in connection with the foreign policy, national security and domestic implications of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (better known as the Law of the Sea Treaty or LOST), there is no question about how our 40th president felt about this accord. He so strongly opposed it that he formally refused to sign the treaty. He even sent Donald Rumsfeld as a personal emissary to our key allies around the world to explain his opposition and encourage them to follow suit. All of them did so at the time.
Proponents of LOST, however, have lately taken--on these pages and elsewhere--to portray President Reagan's concerns as relatively circumscribed. They contend that those objections were subsequently and satisfactorily addressed in a multilateral accord known as the Agreement of 1994. To the extent that such assertions may induce senators who would otherwise oppose the Law of the Sea Treaty to vote for it, perhaps within a matter of weeks and after only the most cursory of reviews, we feel compelled to set the record straight. CONTINUED
BY WILLIAM P. CLARK AND EDWIN MEESE
It is an impressive testament to the abiding affection and political influence of former President Ronald Reagan that the fate of a controversial treaty now before the U.S. Senate may ultimately turn on a single question: What would Reagan do?
As we had the privilege of working closely with President Reagan in connection with the foreign policy, national security and domestic implications of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (better known as the Law of the Sea Treaty or LOST), there is no question about how our 40th president felt about this accord. He so strongly opposed it that he formally refused to sign the treaty. He even sent Donald Rumsfeld as a personal emissary to our key allies around the world to explain his opposition and encourage them to follow suit. All of them did so at the time.
Proponents of LOST, however, have lately taken--on these pages and elsewhere--to portray President Reagan's concerns as relatively circumscribed. They contend that those objections were subsequently and satisfactorily addressed in a multilateral accord known as the Agreement of 1994. To the extent that such assertions may induce senators who would otherwise oppose the Law of the Sea Treaty to vote for it, perhaps within a matter of weeks and after only the most cursory of reviews, we feel compelled to set the record straight. CONTINUED
Hamas: Coming to a School Board Near You?
By Patrick Poole
Exactly how did a known Hamas operative obtain an interview with and almost get appointed to the Columbus, Ohio Public School Board, which oversees one of the largest school districts in the country? And what does this incident tell us about the domestic terror threat and the process of radicalization happening right now in the US?
Those were the questions raised during my research for an article I recently wrote titled “Hamas in the House.” It revealed that a woman named Anisa Abd El Fattah was scheduled to speak at an “interfaith” event to be held in the atrium of the Ohio State Capitol later this month. Not only was Fattah past president of the United Association for Studies and Research (UASR), an organization founded by Specially Designated Global Terrorist Mousa Abu Marzook and described by another convicted terror leader as “the political command for Hamas in the United States,” but she also co-authored two books with current Hamas spokesman Ahmed Yousef. Yousef fled the US in 2005 to avoid prosecution and immediately reappeared as one of the top leaders of Hamas. He has been described by one Middle Eastern newspaper as “The Smiling Face of Hamas.” CONTINUED
Exactly how did a known Hamas operative obtain an interview with and almost get appointed to the Columbus, Ohio Public School Board, which oversees one of the largest school districts in the country? And what does this incident tell us about the domestic terror threat and the process of radicalization happening right now in the US?
Those were the questions raised during my research for an article I recently wrote titled “Hamas in the House.” It revealed that a woman named Anisa Abd El Fattah was scheduled to speak at an “interfaith” event to be held in the atrium of the Ohio State Capitol later this month. Not only was Fattah past president of the United Association for Studies and Research (UASR), an organization founded by Specially Designated Global Terrorist Mousa Abu Marzook and described by another convicted terror leader as “the political command for Hamas in the United States,” but she also co-authored two books with current Hamas spokesman Ahmed Yousef. Yousef fled the US in 2005 to avoid prosecution and immediately reappeared as one of the top leaders of Hamas. He has been described by one Middle Eastern newspaper as “The Smiling Face of Hamas.” CONTINUED
Bush U.N. ambassador says he's 'caving' on world court
Bolton sees blocking of death sentence for Mexican rapist-murderer 'ridiculous'
(WorldNet Daily) Former U.N. ambassador John Bolton says the Bush administration is caving in to global opinion by siding with Mexico and the International Court of Justice in their attempt to overturn the death penalty of an illegal alien convicted of raping and murdering two teenage girls.
It's "a bad mistake, but one of many mistakes, I'm sad to say, the administration has made recently," Bolton said in an interview with nationally syndicated radio host Laura Ingraham.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday in the case of Jose Medellin, who confessed in 1993 to participating in the rape and murder of Houston teenagers Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena. The girls were sodomized and strangled with their shoe laces. Medellin bragged about keeping one girl's Mickey Mouse watch as a souvenir of the crime.
Medellin and four others were convicted of capital murder and sent to Texas' death row. The intervention in the case by the Bush administration comes after the International Court of Justice in the Hague found Medellin was not informed of his right to contact the Mexican Consulate for legal assistance. The cases of some 50 other Mexicans on death row could also be affected.
Bolton insisted the U.S. has no obligation to the world court in this case.
"It is ridiculous," he said. "The Vienna Convention on consular relations does not create rights personal to the individual. It's a state-to-state agreement." CONTINUED
US Designates 3 Saudi Funders as Terrorists
The US Department of the Treasury has designated as Specially Designated Global Terrorists three individuals based in Saudi Arabia who have served as significant sources of financial and other support to individuals and entities in Southeast Asia previously named as SDGTs and listed pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1267. "These three terrorist financiers were instrumental in raising money to fund terrorism outside of Saudi Arabia," said Stuart Levey, Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence. "In order to deter other would-be donors, it is important to hold these terrorists publicly accountable." Abdul Rahim Al-Talhi, Muhammad Abdallah Salih Sughayr, and Fahd Muhammad Abd Al-Aziz Al-Khashiban were designated for providing support to the Abu Sayyaf Group, an al Qaeda-affiliated terrorist group responsible for multiple bombings, kidnappings and other terrorist attacks in Southeast Asia. The action was taken pursuant to Executive Order 13224. EO13224 is aimed at financially isolating terrorists and their support networks. Designations made under this authority freeze any assets the designees may have under US jurisdiction and prohibit transactions by US persons with the designees. This action under EO13224 also implements the decision by the UN1267 Committee to include these three persons on its Consolidated List of persons and entities associated with al Qaeda , the Taliban, or Osama bin Laden. This UN decision obligates UN member countries around the world to freeze the assets of the designees. SOURCE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
